A critique of corporate rituals that promise certainty in an unpredictable world.
The search bar blinks with infuriating patience. My fingers know the path without my brain’s permission: Shared Drive > Global Ops > Strategy > 2024 > Q1. There it is. Q1_Strategic_Pillars_FINAL_v8.pdf. The digital dust on it feels almost real. It’s February 28th. The file was last modified January 8th.
I click it open. The consultant-approved graphics load with a sterile crispness. Five pillars, each a different shade of corporate blue, promising to ‘Operationalize Synergy’ and ‘Activate Downstream Leverage.’ I stare at Pillar #3: ‘Expand Integration with Project Chimera.’ A Slack message from yesterday afternoon scrolls through my mind. It was an all-caps bulletin from the CTO. Project Chimera had been ‘sunsetted’ as part of a strategic realignment. The pillar, not even two months old, is now an archeological relic. A fossil from a forgotten era. It lasted 48 days.
Pillar #3: Project Chimera
‘Expand Integration with Project Chimera’ was a strategic pillar that lasted a mere 48 days before being ‘sunsetted’. An archeological relic, a fossil from a forgotten era.
We love to blame the plan. We say the assumptions were wrong, the market shifted, the re-org came out of nowhere. But that’s a dodge. It’s a convenient way to avoid the terrifying truth that the plan was never the point. The plan is a beautiful lie we pay a fortune to tell ourselves.
The Illusion of Control
Its real purpose is to be a corporate ritual, an incredibly expensive ceremony to create the temporary illusion of control. We spend six months and $288,000 on consultants to build a totem pole. We gather the entire village, point to the sky, and perform a dance to guarantee a good harvest. We carve our intentions into the wood, wrap them in the language of deliverables and KPIs, and for a brief, shining moment, we all feel safe. We feel aligned. We believe we have a map for the dark woods ahead. But it’s not a map. It’s a security blanket woven from spreadsheets and Gantt charts.
The Masterpiece Rendered Obsolete
Anna C.-P., a brilliant virtual background designer, witnessed her company’s 78-page strategic masterpiece quickly overshadowed when the core video conferencing platform released an 88% similar feature for free.
“The masterpiece is now just a PDF on a server somewhere, another fossil.”
It’s a pattern of criticizing something and then doing it anyway. I mock these grand plans, but I once championed one. I sat in a conference room for what felt like weeks, wielding a whiteboard marker like a magic wand, drawing boxes and arrows that connected everything into a perfect, closed loop. The sense of power, of intellectual tidiness, was intoxicating. We were building a map, and I was the cartographer. We presented the 18-month roadmap to cheering executives. Eight weeks later, the foundational API our entire platform was built on was deprecated by its creator. Our perfect map led directly off a cliff we couldn’t have possibly foreseen.
We mistake the artifact for the outcome.
The beautiful document is not the achievement; it’s the temporary alignment that matters.
Mailbox Logic vs. Jungle Trek
It’s human. We crave certainty. It took me 138 steps to get to my mailbox this morning. I counted. Each footfall was a predictable, tangible event. There was a start, a middle, and a known destination. That small, enclosed loop of certainty feels good, it feels controllable. The problem is we try to apply that mailbox logic to a chaotic, unpredictable global market. We want the journey from Q1 to Q4 to feel as safe as a walk to the end of the driveway, but it’s not. It’s a blindfolded trek through a jungle.
✓
Mailbox Logic
Predictable, controllable steps.
VS
?
Jungle Trek
Chaotic, unpredictable path.
This obsession with intricate, long-range forecasts is a specific kind of corporate sickness. It’s a deep-seated fear of admitting the most honest thing a leader can say: “We have a direction and a set of principles, but we don’t really know what’s coming next.” Instead, we build the beautiful lie. It affects some more than others. The companies chasing abstract digital frontiers, like Anna’s, are most susceptible. They have to invent the future, so they feel an overwhelming need to document it in advance. But some organizations thrive on a mission so simple it feels almost radical in its stability. Think about your local family dentist. Their ‘strategy’ isn’t a 58-page PDF reviewed quarterly; it’s being available when a kid has a toothache, providing consistent and trustworthy care, and building a reputation over 18 years, not 18 months. Their plan is their purpose. The execution is about showing up and doing the work, every single day. The strategy is baked into the action, not laminated on the wall.
Building a Better Compass
So what’s the alternative? Do we just wander aimlessly? No. The planning ritual itself isn’t worthless. The act of getting those people in a room for 48 hours is what matters. The arguments, the negotiations, the shared language that develops-that’s the harvest. It’s the temporary alignment and social cohesion that allows a team to move forward together into the fog. The mistake is believing the paper artifact we produce at the end is the treasure. The real treasure is the shared understanding, which is alive and must be allowed to adapt.
Map vs. Compass
A map is static, telling you where to go. A compass is dynamic, offering direction and allowing for navigation as the terrain unfolds.
🗺️
The Map (Static)
A fixed path, rigid.
The Compass (Dynamic)
Flexible direction, adaptable.
The compass is your organization’s core mission. Its inviolable principles. The simple, non-negotiable reason you exist.
For that dentist, the compass is ‘provide reliable care to this community.’ Every decision can be oriented around that true north. For a tech company, it might be ‘make complex information accessible.’ The specific products and features will change, get sunsetted, and be rendered obsolete. The beautiful, detailed plans for them will become ghosts on the server. But the compass remains. That’s the thing that survives the re-org.