I wouldn’t really sweating moving banks for an extra .26% interest. If you want the other bank or investment company go ahead and switch. My only advice is to take action in chunks and ensure that the money deposited at the new bank has cleared before moving the rest of the money to them. You don’t want to end up in a crunch in the event there is a hold and you also now need the amount of money ASAP.
As for someone else offering even higher interest, sure could happen. There already are other banking institutions offering higher than 2.51% interest–I have money at two credit unions that are providing 3% right now. However, the money I devote high yield cost savings is usually money that is ear designated either for my crisis fund or for short-term savings goals. As such, I don’t keep profit high yield cost savings to make me rich, I really do so so the money is safe, liquid, and highly accessible. It’s just a bonus that high yield interest accounts exist to help negate the consequences of inflation.
Instead, I rely on my other investment accounts (eg. It’s in these accounts that you should be focusing on your prosperity building. A supplementary .26% won’t make you wealthy unless you have a ludicrous amount in cash cost savings. In which particular case, you ought to be investing that profit the currency markets or other investment vehicles instead.
I believe that Fox News and the Republican right have intimidated the press into an incredible self-consciousness about appearing objective and backed them into a large part of types where they have ceded a few of their responsibility and righteous power. The Washington Post and NY Times apologies about their initial reporting about Iraq not being critical enough were very revealing. I am a dedicated Times audience, and I’ve found tremendous sustenance from Paul Krugman and Maureen Dowd on the op-ed page. There’s been great reporting, but there’s also been some self-consciousness in some of the reporting about the plan variations in this election.
This is going to be an issue after the election. I have no idea if it began with the Iraq War, but soon thereafter there was an enormous amount of Fox impersonators among what you previously thought were relatively sane media outlets over the cable channels. It was very disheartening. The working job of the press is to be honest without dread or favor.
We need to get back again to that standard. The free press is supposed to be the lifeline and the bloodstream of democracy. This is the position of responsibility that those establishments have. Those ideas are distorted by ratings and by money to where you are getting 1 hour of the political conventions.
No matter how staged these are, I think they’re a bit more important than people eating insects. I believe that for those few evenings, the political life of the country should take priority, and the known reality that it so casually will not mean something is wrong. If you wish to watch people eating bugs, that’s fine, I could understand that, too, but let’s do it on another night. Real information is the news headlines, we have to protect our freedoms. You get tabloid news, you get blood-and-guts information, you get information shot through with a self-glorifying facade of patriotism, but folks have to sift too much for the news that people need to safeguard our freedoms.
It should be gloriously provided to the people on the nightly basis. The loss of some of the soberness and seriousness of these institutions has already established a devastating effect upon people’s capability to respond to the events of your day. Q: Do you think the press is leading us from a good and objective reading of the election?
A: It’s getting very complicated, and I believe it’s blurred the reality. Whether you like the Michael Moore film or not, a big part of its value was that it demonstrated how sanitized the war that we received on television during the night is. The fact that the administration refused to permit photographs of the flag-draped coffins of returning lifeless, that the leader hasn’t shown up at a single military services funeral for the teenagers who offered their lives for his procedures, is disgraceful. You have the Swift-boat men who’ve been much discredited quite, but there can be an atmosphere that is created by so much willing media exposure that it imparts them credibility.
Q: What do you consider the duty of the artist is in society? A: There is a long tradition of the designer being mixed up in the full life of the nation. For me, it goes to Woody Guthrie back, James Brown, Curtis Mayfield, and Bob Dylan. We were holding all cultural people who had been alternative sources of information. When Dylan hit in the mid-Sixties, he brought with him as true a reading of what was going on as being out there. People have the choice to not listen, nevertheless, you have these carrying on business lobbyists who affect the path of public policy.